By Nate Raymond and Hugh Bronstein
NEW YORK/BUENOS AIRES | 
        
Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:20pm EDT
        
     
 (Reuters) - Argentina
 challenged a U.S. court over the weekend by proposing that "holdout" 
bond investors be repaid only about one sixth the money federal judges 
hearing the case say they are owed, setting the stage for a legal 
showdown in New York.
The terms offered by 
Argentina
 are the same as those accepted by bondholders who chose to participate 
in the country's 2010 sovereign bond restructuring. The holdouts 
rejected that restructuring and are holding out for full repayment.
Aside
 from the implications the case has for Argentina's finances, it could 
also have wide ramifications for the way future sovereign restructurings
 are carried around the world.
Argentina
 defaulted on $100 billion in sovereign debt in 2002 at the height of a 
financial crisis in Latin America's third largest 
economy. The 
bonds now under dispute were issued in New York, which is why the case is being heard in U.S. court.
Elliott
 Management affiliate NML Capital Ltd, one of the lead plaintiffs, has 
said that it will not accept 2010 terms They and other holdouts are sure
 to argue that Argentina's proposal does not respond to the court's 
request.
"The court said 'You owe 
the holdouts $1.3 billion. Tell us how you are going to pay that to 
them,'" said Josh Rosner, managing director at research firm Graham 
Fisher & Co in New York.
"Instead
 of answering how they will pay the full amount, Argentina responded 
with a plan for paying a much smaller amount," he said. "Argentina is 
flirting with technical default, which would take a serious toll its 
economy."
The
 specter of technical defaults comes from the fact that a U.S. District 
Court in New York has said that until the holdouts start getting paid, 
Argentina cannot make payments to holders of the restructured 
bonds.
Elliott
 stands currently to receive $720 million from Argentina following a New
 York judge's order in November, according to Argentina.
But
 the bonds NML could take had a market value of just $186.8 million 
before a major decision in the case last October favoring the holdouts, 
or $120.6 million as of March 1, the filing said. Argentina estimates 
NML paid about $48.7 million in 2008 for its stake in the bonds.
"The
 Republic is prepared to fulfill the terms of this proposal promptly 
upon Order by the Court by submitting a bill to Congress that ensures 
its timely implementation," Jonathan Blackman, Argentina's U.S. lawyer, 
wrote.
Around 92 percent of 
Argentina's defaulted bonds were restructured in 2005 and 2010, with 
bondholders receiving 25 cents to 29 cents on the dollar.
But
 holdouts led by NML Capital and Aurelius Capital Management have fought
 for years for full payment. Argentina calls these funds "vultures."
In
 October, the 2nd Circuit upheld a trial judge's ruling by finding 
Argentina had violated a so-called pari passu clause in its bond 
documents requiring it to treat creditors equally.
U.S.
 District Judge Thomas Griesa in Manhattan subsequently ordered 
Argentina in November to pay the $1.33 billion owed to the bondholders 
into an escrow account by the time of its next interest payment to 
holders of the exchanged debt.
The
 2nd Circuit heard an appeal of that order on February 27. Two days 
later, it directed Argentina to provide details of "the precise terms of
 any alternative payment formula and schedule to which it is prepared to
 commit."
The American courts found a loopole pari passu clause in its bond 
documents requiring it to treat creditors equally.
 It seems that between 2005 and 2010 only received 25 cents to 29 cent on the dollar and so why do the courts thinks that full payment is equally. I think with the Argentina economy they should be happy to get anything, so if I were them I would take what is being offered before there is no money left.